Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Non-Matrimonial Property in Divorce

In a landmark decision handed down on 2 July 2025, the UK Supreme Court has clarified how non-matrimonial property should be treated in divorce proceedings. The case of Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26 reaffirmed that non-matrimonial assets - those acquired before marriage or received through inheritance or gift - are not automatically subject to equal division between spouses. This judgment provides guidance on how courts should approach the classification and distribution of such property in family law cases.

The dispute centred around Mr Standish, who had transferred assets worth £77.8 million to his wife during the marriage. These assets had been acquired prior to the marriage and were transferred into Mrs Standish’s sole name as part of a tax planning strategy. At first instance, the High Court found that the transfer had effectively “matrimonialised” the assets, thereby bringing them within the pool of marital property. As a result, the court awarded Mrs Standish a significantly larger share than she would have otherwise received. However, this decision was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, which held that the assets remained non-matrimonial in character, and should not be subject to equal division.

The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal’s ruling, confirming that the key consideration in such cases is the source of the property, not merely the name in which it is held. The Court emphasised that non-matrimonial property does not become matrimonial simply because it is transferred into joint names or into the sole name of the other spouse. For such a transfer to alter the character of the property, there must be clear evidence of an intention to share it as part of the marital partnership.

This decision sets out five important principles.

The classification of property hinges on its source, not its legal ownership.
Non-matrimonial property will remain outside the sharing principle unless there is a conscious and deliberate act of “matrimonialisation”.
The mere fact that assets are used during the marriage or transferred between spouses does not automatically mean they are intended to be shared.
Transfers made solely for tax planning purposes do not indicate an intention to bring assets into the marital pool.
Finally, even if an asset is non-matrimonial, it may still be used to satisfy the financial needs of the parties or form the basis of a compensation claim if appropriate.

In practical terms, this ruling means that family lawyers must now focus more closely on the intentions behind asset transfers during the marriage. Documentation, such as post-nuptial agreements or contemporaneous records of financial planning, will be key in determining whether a particular asset has been converted into matrimonial property. The judgment also reinforces the need for clarity in financial arrangements between spouses, particularly in high-net-worth cases where large sums or complex asset structures are involved.

For spouses entering a marriage with significant personal wealth, the ruling offers reassurance that those assets will not be lost to the sharing principle simply because of administrative decisions made during the marriage. However, it also serves as a cautionary tale: if wealth is to be protected, steps must be taken to preserve its non-matrimonial character through careful legal and financial planning.

Ultimately, Standish v Standish provides clarity in an area that has long been seen as unpredictable. It draws a firmer line around what qualifies as matrimonial property and ensures that the division of assets on divorce will more accurately reflect the original intentions of the parties. The message from the Supreme Court is clear: ownership alone does not dictate fairness - intention and context are what truly matter.

Our Family team are there to support you through careful financial planning, prenuptial agreements, divorce, financial settlements and more! You can learn more about how they can help here.

Give the team a call today and they will be more than happy to discuss your options with you.

Stafford 01785 252377
Newcastle 01782 987551
Alsager 01270 446260